A new twist in the inspector suicide case
Recently, a case of an inspector lying on the railway track has come to light in Aligarh of Uttar Pradesh. The inspector accused the remand judge of extortion. The inspector said that the judge called him to the cabin every 10 minutes and insulted him, due to which he got bored and committed suicide on the railway tracks. This video went viral on social media but now there is a new twist in this story. The remand judge has also accused the inspector of misbehaving in court.
The remand magistrate has seriously charged the inspector with indecent behavior and threats in court, following which the CJM sent a written complaint to Aligarh’s senior superintendent of police for misbehaving and threatening him. Court with Remand Magistrate. In the complaint sent to the SSP, the judge alleged that the accused sub-inspector openly threatened him and said that the police had fined the senior judge, he would write a report and he would go mad.
What is the matter?
Actually, Inspector Sachin Kumar is posted at Bannadevi Police Station. Recently he nabbed a gang of car thieves. Adeeb, Armaan, Aamir, Sharik and Faiz, accused of the vehicle theft gang, were produced before a judicial magistrate for remand on September 16. The inspector alleged that the magistrate came at 5 pm, but did not remand. He was also kept in the court till 10 pm. The Magistrate said that there was insufficient evidence for remand despite presenting all the evidence required for remand.
What did the inspector say?
According to the inspector, the judge misbehaved with him, after which he became enraged and went to the railway tracks to commit suicide. Policemen shot a video of the incident which went viral on social media. In this video, it is seen that Inspector Sachin slept on the railway track to commit suicide and started waiting for the train, after which fellow policemen reached there and somehow persuaded him to remove him from there. The inspector told the remand judge that the judicial magistrate misbehaved and ill-treated him. The magistrate calls me to his cabin every 10 minutes and insults me, saying that we have caught fake accused, when all the accused are vicious criminals, with old criminal history. On September 17, the inspector lodged a complaint against the judicial magistrate at the Bannadevi police station and sought to register a case, but no case was registered. After this, the judge wrote a complaint letter to the SSP.
What did the judge say?
On September 18, the judge wrote a 2-page letter against the inspector. He said in this that on September 16, 4 accused namely Adeeb, Shariq, Aamir, Arbaaz and Faiz were brought before the court. I have examined the documents and FIR copy given for remand. All were accused of bike theft, the recovery of the bike was also shown, but still there was not enough evidence to send the accused to police remand. Apart from this, the medical report of the accused revealed that there were injury marks on his body which means that he was assaulted. Even his family was not informed and was not mentioned about his arrest. There were irregularities in the arrest of the accused, after which I refused to remand the inspector.
Police conducted further investigation
The judge said in his complaint letter that when he gave the order, Sachin Kumar, the investigating officer of the case, remarked to the full court that the police did not have enough time to give such useless information to the families. The accused judge said that after hearing this comment, he told the inspector that the court sees that the rights of the accused are not being violated. To which the inspector replied that the job of the remand magistrate is to remand, the police should not see the details of the documents of any accused brought, the magistrate has the compulsion to remand. As soon as I heard this from the inspector, I said don’t use such language. According to the judge, after this he loudly said that the police had fined the grand jury. Will write a report, clear your mind. He then threw the remand document and case diary in front of me and left. Currently, SP City Mrigang Shekhar Pathak said that the judge has filed a complaint against the inspector. The case is being investigated. The inspector is also being questioned. Every fact connected with the case is being investigated so that everything becomes clear. Further action will be taken based on the investigation.
