Breaking India State Sports Career Business Entertainment Biography Lifestyle

Agra: ‘Victory’ for Taj Mahal water offerer, court rejects ASI’s appeal to quash case

Nita Yadav

By Nita Yadav

Published on:

The court reserved its decision on the demand for Jalabhishek and Dugdha Abhishek at Agra’s Taj Mahal, which is included in the eighth wonder of the world and is considered a symbol of love. Today, the Yogi Youth Brigade has won a major victory in this dispute and the court has dismissed the ASI’s appeal. The court has ordered the Union of India to be made a party and fixed the next date of hearing.

In fact, the Yogi Youth Brigade filed a demand in the court for Jalabhishek and Dugdha Abhishek calling the Taj Mahal Tejo Mahalaya. A bench of Justice Mrityunjay Srivastava on Monday afternoon dismissed the appeal and objection of the respondent Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and agreed to make the Union Ministry of Culture a respondent.

ASI’s appeal dismissed

The appeal and objection of the respondent Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) was dismissed and the Union Ministry of Culture was allowed to be made a respondent after a hearing in the Small Causes Court by Judge Mrityunjay Srivastava on Monday afternoon. Kunwar Ajay Tomar, state president of the Yogi Yuva Brigade, had filed a suit in the court in Savan, demanding that the court grant him permission for Jalabhishek and Dugdhabhishekam of Lord Mahadev in Tejomahalaya. In this case, after the hearing on 13th September, the judge reserved the verdict and gave the date of hearing on 16th September i.e. Monday.

The hearing was held on September 13

In the hearing held on 13th September, advocate Vivek Kumar of the respondent ASI Superintending Archaeologist Dr. Rajkumar Patel raised an objection in the court stating that ASI Superintendent Archaeologist Dr. Rajkumar Patel is a government official who cannot appear in the case. Action has been taken. The ASI had petitioned the court to make the Indian government a defendant in the case. Opposing the case, during the hearing, the Hindu side’s counsel argued in the court that a case can be filed against a government official by serving a notice under Section 80 CPC. After the arguments of both sides in the court, the court reserved the verdict.

Nita Yadav

Nita Yadav

I am Nita Yadav, specializing in writing about politics and breaking national news. My focus is on delivering insightful and timely perspectives on these crucial topics, aiming to inform and engage my readers effectively.

Related Post

Leave a comment